Evidence Hub

Sexual dysfunction is underrecognized in patients with migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dörtkol O, Atalar AÇ, Yetkin Ö, Ekizoğlu E, Baykan B

Headache, 2026

1,692 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to summarize and pool the existing observational evidence on sexual dysfunction (SD) in patients with migraine and to explore sex-specific associations.

BACKGROUND

SD appears to be more common in patients with migraine, yet the available data are heterogeneous and scattered, with most research focused on women. A comprehensive synthesis across both sexes has been lacking.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies identified relevant studies reporting data on SD published between July 1987 and July 2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies including 1692 patients with migraine and 741 controls were identified; nine studies were qualified for quantitative analysis. Reported SD prevalence ranged from 41.8% to 91.0% among women and from 46.6% to 80.0% among men. Across controlled studies, patients with migraine showed a higher likelihood of experiencing SD compared with healthy controls (odds ratio [OR], 6.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-23.60). In women, the likelihood of SD was more than three times higher (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.22-10.9). Data for men were limited to two small, controlled studies, both indicating higher SD rates among male patients with migraine (OR, 164.85; 95% CI, 21.09-1288.89). When studies with extreme values were excluded, the association between migraine and SD remained still elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

SD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,692 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free