Evidence Hub

Neuropsychological Functioning in Pediatric Primary Headache Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Pizer JH, Hernandez KA, Aita SL, Ikonomou VC, Myers MA, Hawley NA, Brasil KM, Borgogna NC et al.

Pediatrics, 2025

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether neuropsychological functioning was impaired among individuals with pediatric primary headache disorders (PHD) compared with individuals without headaches. Adults with migraine appear to evidence deficits in neuropsychological performance, but few reviews have examined whether cognitive performance is impaired among children and adolescents with primary headache disorders.

METHODS: we considered studies using a validated clinical neuropsychological measure among pediatric samples (<20-y old) that included a phd and control sample. two authors independently reviewed candidate articles to determine inclusion and to extract data. data were pooled using random-effects models. data sources: pubmed, embase, proquest health & medical, proquest psychology database, and psycinfo were searched from inception to february 2024.

RESULTS: Analysis of 16 included studies indicated significantly worse overall neuropsychological performance among pediatric PHD (g = -0.31; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.17), as well as significantly worse performance across the motor, executive function, learning/memory, language, processing speed, intelligence, and visuospatial/construction domains, as compared with nonheadache controls. Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 43.13%) but analyses of publication bias and moderators were not significant. Sensitivity analyses indicated that negative effects were driven by samples with migraine and not observed among tension-type headache…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free