Evidence Hub

Mitochondrial mutation status, symptom prevalence, and neuroimaging characteristics in MELAS: a systematic review and meta analysis

Li Y, Han S, Huang D, Chen J, Qu S, Gu J, Xu Z, Fu L et al.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026

988 participants

Abstract

Background: Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) is a rare mitochondrial disorder characterized by a wide range of systemic manifestations. MELAS is challenging to diagnose in its early stages and currently lacks targeted treatments. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to validate the mitochondrial 3243A > G (m.3243A > G) mutation status, symptom prevalence, and neuroimaging characteristics in patients with MELAS. The review also seeks to consolidate and clarify the pathogenic pathways of MELAS while pinpointing potential therapeutic targets.

Main body: We searched four databases for relevant studies. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) scale were performed by two reviewers. We conducted meta-analyses to estimate the pooled proportions for genetic, symptomatic, and imaging features using the random-effects generalized linear mixed model. In addition, seven MELAS-related pathways were researched, and their gene information was expanded through computational retrieval from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Reactome databases. A total of 13 studies involving 988 subjects were included, covering one mutant gene (m.3243A > G), ten clinical symptoms, and four imaging features. The meta-analyses showed a pooled m.3243A > G mutation prevalence of 78% (95% CI: 68%, 86%). The most frequent clinical manifestations were stroke-like episodes (99%; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 988 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free