Evidence Hub

Identifying key risk factors for the recurrence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo following successful canalith repositioning maneuvers: a meta analysis

Wen Y, Fan Y, Jian B

European journal of medical research, 2025

229 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background: An increasing occurrence trend of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) after successful canalith repositioning maneuvers was observed; however, the risk elements for the occurrence of this disease remain undefined. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of BPPV occurrence-associated risk factors reported.

Methods: A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Springer, and the Cochrane Library up to March 31, 2024. The meta-analysis was carried out with STATA 16.0. Quality evaluation of the articles was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales (NOS). Data were pooled by a random-effects model. The meta-analysis was registered at INPLASY (202430045).

Results: Seventeen studies with 229 patients were included in the present analysis. The recurrence rate of BPPV after Canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) or Epley maneuver in subjects with hypertension [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.88,95% confidence interval (CI) (0.81-0.96), P = 0.00], Meniere's disease [SMD = 0.84, 95%CI (0.57-1.10), P = 0.00], head trauma [SMD = 0.48, 95%CI (0.34-0.63), P = 0.00], diabetes mellitus (DM) [SMD = 0.87, 95%CI (0.80-0.94), P = 0.00], advanced age [SMD = 0.18, 95%CI (0.08-0.28), P = 0.00], osteoporosis [SMD = 0.32, 95%CI (0.20-0.43), P = 0.00], female gender [SMD = 0.53, 95%CI (0.40-0.67), P = 0.00], migraine headache [SMD = 0.20, 95%CI (0.06-0.35), P = 0.01], and vitamin D deficiency [OR = 0.29, 95%CI (0.18-0.40), P = 0.00] were appreciably higher than those in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 229 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free