Evidence Hub

Risk factors for mortality in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia – a meta-analysis

Chienhsiu Huang, Lichen Lin, Sufang Kuo

Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2024

1,248 participants · 41 citations

Abstract

Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a nosocomial pathogen causing life-threatening invasive infections with a high mortality rate in some patient populations, especially those who are severely ill or immunocompromised.There is a need for data on mortality in patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.Objective: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate risk factors for mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia.Methods: Studies comparing patients who died from S. maltophilia bacteremia with patients who survived were considered for inclusion.Studies were included if they reported one or more risk factors for mortality.Mortality risk factors included clinical predisposing factors, predisposing comorbidities and appropriateness of antibiotic therapy.Results: Nineteen studies with 1248 patients were included in the meta-analysis.Five hundred and six (40.5%) patients died.The following risk factors for mortality were identified: ICU admission, septic shock, need for mechanical ventilation, indwelling central venous catheter, neutropenia, comorbid hematological malignancies, chronic kidney disease, inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and prior antibiotic use.Conclusions: Appropriate antimicrobial therapy had a protective effect against mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia.Indwelling central venous catheter, neutropenia, hematological malignancies and chronic kidney disease were also risk factors for mortality.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,248 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free