Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Exploring the Link Between Physical Inactivity and Indicators of Childhood Overweight/Obesity and Metabolically Unhealthy Obesity Risk in Western Countries

Georgoulis M, Grapsa I, Arnaoutis G, Karachaliou A, Panagiotakos D, Saltaouras G, Bathrellou E, Yannakoulia M et al.

Current obesity reports, 2026

8 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity (PI) is a major contributor to adiposity and cardiometabolic morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize evidence of the association between PI and childhood overweight/obesity (OV/OB) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO; OB accompanied by cardiometabolic abnormalities) risk. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023482960). Studies conducted in Western countries with 2-19-year-old participants, PI-related exposures (time/frequency of engagement in various sedentary behaviors) and interventions (targeting PI reduction), OV/OB-/MUO-related outcomes and ≥ 12-month follow-up were extracted from PubMed and Scopus (publication timeframe: 01/01/2013-30/06/2024). Study quality was assessed through risk of bias (RoB). RESULTS: Among 86 prospective epidemiological studies with OV/OB-related outcomes (42% high-RoB), PI was evaluated objectively (accelerometry) in 34 and subjectively (questionnaires) in 57 (29% and 68% reported detrimental associations, respectively). In random-effects meta-analysis, subjectively-assessed total screen time was positively associated with body mass index (BMI) [n = 4; beta (95%CI): 0.116 (0.037, 0.195) kg/m2] and BMI z-score [n = 8; beta (95%CI): 0.032 (0.002, 0.063)], while television viewing was positively associated with BMI [n = 3; beta (95%CI): 0.227 (0.025, 0.428) kg/m2],…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free