Evidence Hub

Effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes on community rates of HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination

Henschke N, Bergman H, Buckley BS, Crosbie EJ, Dwan K, Golder SP, Kyrgiou M, Loke YK et al.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025

132 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has the potential to enhance prevention of cervical cancer, especially in countries where screening programmes are currently unaffordable or impractical. Rare adverse events and longer-term benefits of HPV vaccination, such as effects on cancer rates, are difficult to examine in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and require large data from population-level studies to inform decision-making.

Objectives: We aimed to assess population-level effects of HPV vaccination programmes on HPV-related disease and harms from vaccination.

Search methods: We conducted electronic searches on 11 September 2024 in CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase. We also searched vaccine manufacturer websites and checked reference lists from an index of HPV studies and other relevant systematic reviews.

Selection criteria: We included studies that assessed the impact of HPV vaccination on the general population. This included population-level studies comparing outcomes before and after the introduction of HPV vaccine. We also included individual-level, non-randomised comparative studies, such as cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies and self-controlled case series.

Data collection and analysis: We used methods recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors carried out data extraction independently using pretested data extraction forms. We assessed the risk of bias of all included effect estimates using different…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 132 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free