Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Topiramate Versus Acetazolamide in the Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: ASystematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Almaqhawi A, Alokley A, Alamri R, Alabdulqader R, Alali A, Aleid A, Alhejji A, ALNasser MN

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Primary pseudotumor cerebri syndrome, another name for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), is a neurological condition marked by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) that can result in papilledema without a known etiology. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of topiramate and acetazolamide as medical treatments for IIH and to evaluate the long-term outcomes of both medications. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and was approved by the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). This study included randomized clinical trials, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Data extraction was performed using the Rayyan application, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). Results: The findings revealed a statistically significant 67% increase in the likelihood of improvement at 6 months compared to the baseline with the administration of acetazolamide and topiramate. After six months of the drug administration, there was a 3.6 times decrease in visual obscuration compared to the baseline. A significant advantage of topiramate in IIH is the added benefit of weight loss, since obesity is a modifiable risk factor. However, acetazolamide remains the conventional treatment. Conclusions: This study found that acetazolamide and topiramate are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free