Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of hemifacial spasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang B, Wei X, Qi H, Bao X, Hu M, Ma J

BMC neurology, 2024

2,786 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Background: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a neuromuscular disorder characterized by unilateral facial muscle spasms, negatively impacts quality of life due to social embarrassment. Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT) injections have emerged as a viable therapeutic approach. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of BoNT injections for HFS management, along with effects on patients' quality of life and mental health.

Materials and methods: A systematic search for studies on BoNT treatment for HFS published between January 1, 2000, and May 1, 2024, was performed across major databases. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools, with data management handled by EndNote X9 and statistical analyses conducted via Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) and STATA 14.0.

Results: Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 RCTs comprising 83 HFS patients compared the efficacy of perioral injections of botulinum toxin and placebo, while 33 single-arm studies reported outcomes for 2786 patients post-BoNT injection. The selection of 17 single-arm studies focused on the effectiveness rate as the key outcome metric. Pooled estimate signified a remarkably high effectiveness (ES: 0.882, 95% CI: 0.830, 0.926, P < 0.001). Analysis of depression scale (SMD: -0.85, 95% CI: -1.34, -0.35, P < 0.001), anxiety scale (SMD: -1.50, 95% CI: -2.19, -0.80, P < 0.001) and total scale of quality of life (SMD: -0.64, 95% CI: -0.87, -0.41, P = 0.766) showed that BoNT…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,786 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free