Evidence Hub

Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis

Melo P, Eapen A, Chung Y, Jeve Y, Price MJ, Sunkara SK, Macklon NS, Khalaf Y et al.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025

59,086 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Background: Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is an essential step in most assisted conception cycles. Different treatment combinations (termed protocols) exist in COS, yet there is no consensus on their relative effectiveness and safety.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the relative effectiveness and safety of COS protocols in clinical practice.

Search methods: We followed standard Cochrane methodology to conduct extensive electronic searches to 11 June 2024.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two COS protocols using any form of pituitary suppression (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, antagonists or progestogens) and human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG), urinary or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (u/rFSH), with or without luteinising hormone (LH) and/or oral medications (e.g. clomifene or letrozole), for ovarian stimulation. The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy (LBR or OPR) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per participant after one stimulation cycle. The secondary outcomes were the rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and cycle cancellation per participant, and the number of oocytes, cleavage-stage embryos, blastocyst-stage embryos and cryopreserved embryos per participant.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We conducted pairwise and network…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 59,086 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free