Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type a (bont-a) use in the treatment of chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luana Izabela Azevedo de Carvalho, A. L. D. de Carvalho, Pedro Lucas Azevedo de Carvalho, Manuela Ribeiro de Queiroz, Kássia Violeta Rodrigues de Matos, Í. Andrade, A. D. de Almeida, Michele Kreuz et al.

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 2024

617 participants

Abstract

Background: Chronic Migraine (CM) is a disabling neurological disorder classified as a complication of migraine. Patients with CM experience headaches on 15 or more days per month in at least three consecutive months. Despites the range of therapeutic treatments, in some cases current treatments often have limited efficacy and intolerable adverse events, highlighting gaps in prophylactic treatment options. OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A), a purified protein that blocks acetylcholine release from presynaptic neurons and inhibits muscle contractions, has shown pain relief in various conditions, including migraine. Clinical trials suggest that BoNT-A may be an effective and safe prophylactic medication for treating migraines and other headache disorders. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BT-A in the treatment of chronic migraine through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: The literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of BoNT-A in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine, comparing it to a placebo group. Studies were screened and selected based on relevance, and data were extracted by independent reviewers. The primary outcomes were the reduction in the number of headache days and the incidence of adverse events. All statistical analyses were performed using the RStudio (version 4.3.2). Results: A total of 11 studies and 3.617…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 617 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free