Evidence Hub

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of celiac disease in migraine patients

Gholamreza Kalvandi, Naser Nasiri, Parya Jangipour Afshar, Hosna Ghaderi, Farzad Faizi, Shoboo Rahmati

PubMed, 2025

Abstract

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is a gluten-induced autoimmune disorder that can present with gastrointestinal, extraintestinal, or no symptoms. The prevalence of CD in migraine patients and the nature of their potential association is not well established. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of CD in migraine patients using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PRISMA guidelines created a framework for the construction of this review article. Two investigators independently searched the electronic databases of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar search engine up to May 2024. To assess heterogeneity among the studies, we used Cochran's Q test and the I² index. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, version 14.2, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: =75.37, P=0.001)). Also, the Odds of CD disease in migraine patients compared to non-migraine patients was estimated to be equal (2.20 (95% CI: 0.87-5.54, I2=48.4, P=0.121)). Additionally, the majority of the research was conducted in Europe. Conclusions: Although the small amount of research accomplished in this particular situation, our data indicate a relatively low prevalence of CD in migraine patients. Therefore, more frequent and thorough research in this field is advised. Patients with migraines experienced fewer attacks when they received gluten-free diets and were screened for celiac disease.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free