Evidence Hub

Eosinophilic complications during dupilumab therapy for type 2 diseases: a systematic review

Matteo Lazzeroni, Paul Robert Kemp, Wytske Johanna Fokkens, Sietze Reitsma

Rhinology Journal, 2025

53 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab shows promising results in the management of several type 2 disorders. However, it often leads to transient, early increases in blood eosinophil count (BEC). This has led to awareness of possibly associated eosinophilic complications, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Aim of the current work was to collect all eosinophilic complications reported in literature. METHODOLOGY: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for papers reporting on eosinophilic complications of dupilumab therapy for type 2 disorders. RESULTS: While around one million patients are treated with dupilumab globally, we identified a total of 35 reports on 53 patients. The most common complications were EGPA: 24 patients, eosinophilic pneumonia: 15, and HES: 6. Complications developed after a median of 9 (range: 0-71) weeks and the median eosinophilic count at the moment of diagnosis was 6.38x109 cells/L (IQR 3.13- 9.08). Most complications were treated with systemic corticosteroids. Of all patients, 89% discontinued dupilumab therapy and no deceased patients were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Reported eosinophilic complications during dupilumab therapy are extremely rare and mostly develop during the first months of treatment, challenging the need for (prolonged) BEC monitoring during dupilumab therapy. No patient patterns or predictors were identified.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free