Evidence Hub

Efficacy of antimicrobials in preventing resistance in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of clinical trials

Carlos M. Ardila, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Jaime Alberto Ramírez-Arbeláez

World Journal of Transplantation, 2024

2,318 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND In the absence of effective antimicrobials, transplant surgery is not viable, and antirejection immunosuppressants cannot be administered, as resistant infections compromise the life-saving goal of organ transplantation. AIM To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobials in preventing resistance in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using a search methodology consistent with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This review included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of antimicrobial agents (prophylactic or therapeutic) aimed at preventing antimicrobial resistance. The search strategy involved analyzing multiple databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and SCIELO, as well as examining gray literature sources on Google Scholar. A comprehensive electronic database search was conducted from the databases’ inception until May 2024, with no language restrictions. RESULTS After the final phase of the eligibility assessment, this systematic review ultimately included 7 articles. A total of 2318 patients were studied. The most studied microorganisms were cytomegalovirus, although vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Clostridioides difficile , and multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales were also analyzed. The antimicrobials used in the interventions were mainly maribavir, valganciclovir, ganciclovir, and colistin-neomycin. Of concern, all clinical trials…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,318 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free