Evidence Hub

PAR-2 monoclonal antibody as a treatment for migraine: a systematic review

Ryan Lucas Barbosa Oliveira, Mariana Araújo Oliveira Barbosa Rocha, Maria Beatriz Cavalcante Brêda, Laís Souza da Silva Vitorino, Maria Izabel Ferreira de Sousa Oliveira, William Correia da Silva Filho, Marcelo Henrique dos Santos, Taíssa Kelly Novais Veiga et al.

Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 2024

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a highly debilitating pathology capable of causing loss of ability to work and social life. Despite the recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide for migraine treatment, not all patients respond well to these drugs. Recently, a new class of drugs, the protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) monoclonal antibodies, has emerged as a potential alternative treatment. PAR-2 is based on blocking meningeal nociceptors, which represents a new therapeutic target. Objective: To evaluate advances in migraine treatment using monoclonal antibodies targeting PAR-2. Methods: This systematic review analyzed studies from Pubmed, Lilacs, BVS, Embase, and Scielo databases, published between 2018 and 2024. The descriptors used were “monoclonal antibodies, migraine disorders, and PAR-2 receptor”, using Boolean operators "and" and "or". Systematic reviews, in vitro studies and animal studies on PAR-2 monoclonal antibodies were included. Studies that did not address its use for migraine were excluded. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Results: A total of 314 articles were found, of which 15 were duplicates. 8 articles were eligible for full reading. Among the articles analyzed, a phase 1 study of MEDI0618, a PAR-2 monoclonal antibody, aimed to evaluate its safety and tolerability in healthy volunteers. Initial findings showed it was well-tolerated with no serious adverse effects;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free