Evidence Hub

The Percentage of Antibiotic Resistance in Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections-Findings of the RedAres Project

Klingeberg A, Willrich N, Schneider M, Schmiemann G, Gágyor I, Richter D, Noll I, Eckmanns T

Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024

2,390 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated bacterial urinary tract infections (uUTIs) are commonly seen in outpatient practice. They are usually treated empirically with antibiotics. The pertinent German Clinical Practice Guideline contains recommendations on antibiotic selection, with the additional advice that the local resistance situation should be considered as well. However, up-to-date information on local resistance is often unavailable, because microbiological testing is mainly recommended for complicated UTIs. Resistance rates are often higher in recurrent uUTIs than in single episodes. In this study, we aimed to determine the resistance rates of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in patients with community-acquired uUTIs and to make these data available to the treating physicians.

METHODS

In a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany (DRKS 00019059), we determined the percentages of resistance to antibiotics recommended for uUTIs (first choice: fosfomycin, nitroxoline, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim; second choice: cefpodoxime, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin) over the period 2019-2021. The data were stratified by single episodes vs. recurrent UTIs (rUTIs).

RESULTS

Data from 2390 subjects were analyzed. E. coli was found in 75.4% of the samples with positive urine cultures (1082 out of 1435). The resistance rate of E. coli in single episodes (n = 725) was less than 15% for all antibiotics tested. In rUTIs (n = 357), resistance rates were also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 2,390 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free