Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Yijinjing for Soft Tissue Improvement in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Hanyu Zou, Fangfang Xie, Hongyu Yue, Xiang Chen, Zong-Lin Wen, Min Fang, Fei Yao

BMJ Open, 2025

132 participants · 177 citations

Abstract

Introduction As a mind–body exercise, Yijinjing has shown benefits in enhancing the effects of manual therapy for the treatment of pain, disability and soft tissue status associated with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP). The efficacy of Yijinjing as an independent exercise regimen for the treatment of NCNP has not been established. This study is designed to assess the efficacy of Yijinjing in patients with NCNP, compared with cervical function training (CFT). Methods and analysis A total of 132 consenting NCNP participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Yijinjing group or the CFT group (three times a week for 8 weeks). Both groups will undergo an 8-week intervention phase. Outcome variables will be assessed at baseline and at 4-week, 8-week and 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome measure is the change in visual analogue scale scores at week 8. Secondary outcomes include neck disability index, cervical range of motion and soft tissue status parameters. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, local laws and regulations. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number ITMCTR2024000323.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 132 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free