Evidence Hub

Cord red blood cell transfusions for severe retinopathy in preterm neonates in Italy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

L. Teofili, P. Papacci, Claudio Pellegrino, C. Dani, Francesco Cresi, Giulia Remaschi, G. Ansaldi, C. Giannantonio et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2025

56 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in preterm neonates are associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods BORN is a multicenter randomized trial investigating whether RBC transfusions from cord blood (CB-RBCs) instead of adult donors (A-RBCs) reduce ROP severity (NCT05100212). The study was conducted between December 2021 and November 2024 in 8 hospitals sited in 8 different Italian regions. Extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) were randomized 1:1 to receive A-RBCs (control) or CB-RBCs (intervention) from birth to postmenstrual age (PMA) of 29 + 6 weeks. The main outcome was severe-ROP rate at 40 weeks PMA or discharge. Findings By intention-to-treat-analysis, 56 patients per arm were evaluated: 16 in the control arm and 14 in the intervention arm developed severe ROP (28·6% versus 25·0%, risk difference [RD] −0·03 [95% CI −0·21% to 0·14%]; P = 0·831). Twenty-four (42·8%) patients in the intervention arm received also A-RBCs. Per-protocol-analysis included those patients receiving exclusively the assigned treatment, consisting of 38 ELGANs in the control arm and 17 in the intervention arm, with comparable characteristics. Thirteen ELGANs in the control arm developed severe ROP, and 10 required ROP treatment whilst no patients in the intervention arm developed severe ROP or treatment-requiring ROP (34·2% versus 0%, RD −0·34 [95% CI −0·51% to −0·07%] for severe ROP, P = 0·005, and 26·3% versus 0%, RD −0·28 [95% CI −0·46% to −0·02%] for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 56 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free