Evidence Hub

Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Yanan Shen, Yuanyuan Wu, Qian-Qian Tang, Yilong Wang, Wei Ma, Jian-Wei Wang

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

92 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are a common complication following gynecological laparoscopic surgery, with opioid use being a significant contributing risk factor. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has emerged as an alternative approach to mitigate opioid-related adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of OFA in reducing PONV and its impact on postoperative recovery. Methods This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial enrolled 92 female patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The patients were randomized 1:1 into two groups, whereby the OFA group received anesthesia with esketamine (0.3 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.6 μg/kg), while the control group received conventional opioid-based anesthesia with sufentanil (0.3 μg/kg). Both groups underwent preoperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with ropivacaine (20 mL per side). Standardized perioperative monitoring and analgesic protocols were maintained. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV within 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score recovery time, postoperative pain scores, antiemetic and analgesic use, and quality of recovery (QoR-15 scores). Results On postoperative day 1, PONV incidence was significantly lower in the OFA group (15.2%) compared to the control group (34.8%) (P = 0.03), and by postoperative day 2, the difference between the groups was no longer…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 92 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free