Evidence Hub

Evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of phage therapy in treating fracture-related infections with multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: intravenous versus local application in sheep

Christian Peez, Baixing Chen, Leopold Henssler, Marco Chittò, Jolien Onsea, M.H.J. Verhofstad, Daniel Arens, Caroline Constant et al.

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2025

16 citations

Abstract

Background: , present significant clinical challenges due to the formation of biofilm on the implanted device, and reduced options for conventional antibiotic treatment. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy (PT) offers a targeted approach to managing such infections, however, evidence for pharmacokinetics and optimal route of administration is limited for FRI. This study aimed to evaluate safety, phage distribution kinetics, phage neutralization, and antibacterial efficacy after intravenous or local administration in a sheep model. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 assessed the safety and distribution of two successive rounds of intravenous and local phage administration in non-infected sheep, while Phase 2 evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of intravenous versus local phage administration in combination with intravenous vancomycin in treating MRSA-induced FRI (tibial osteotomy with plate fixation). The specific pathogen and phage used in the sheep were both taken from a human FRI patient treated with PT. Phage neutralization and phage distribution were the primary outcomes measured in both phases of the sheep study. Results: Both intravenous and local phage administration were well-tolerated in non-infected sheep. Phages were cleared rapidly from circulation after intravenous administration, with no phage detected after 240 minutes. Phage neutralization increased during PT, peaking at 99.9% in non-inoculated sheep by the end of the second phage treatment (day…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free