Evidence Hub

Rapid Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy with Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Efavirenz, Lamivudine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-positive Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Week 48 Results of the Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Ran Wang, Li-Jun Sun, Xi Wang, Yuanyi Zhai, Li-Jing Wang, Ping Ma, Cuisong Wu, Yingquan Zhou et al.

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2024

18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most international treatment guidelines recommend rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for people newly diagnosed with HIV-1 infection, but experiences with rapid ART initiation remain limited in China. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efavirenz (400-mg) plus lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV + 3TC + TDF) versus coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in rapid ART initiation among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM).

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolled MSM aged ≥18 years to start ART within 14 days of confirmed HIV diagnosis. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EFV(400-mg) + 3TC + TDF or BIC/FTC/TAF. The primary end point was viral suppression (<50 copies/ml) at 48 weeks per FDA Snapshot analysis.

RESULTS

Between March 2021 and July 2022, 300 participants were enrolled; 154 were assigned to receive EFV + 3TC + TDF (EFV group) and 146 BIC/FTC/TAF (BIC group). At week 48, 118 (79.2%) and 140 (95.9%) participants in the EFV and BIC group, respectively, were retained in care with viral suppression; and 24 (16.1%) and 1 (0.7%) participant in the EFV and BIC group (p < 0.001), respectively, discontinued treatment due to adverse effects, death, or loss to follow-up. The median increase of CD4 count was 181 and 223 cells/μL (p = 0.020), respectively, for the EFV and BIC group, at week 48. The overall incidence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free