Evidence Hub

Association of respiratory drive and effort with mortality and time to discharge in patients on mechanical ventilation in Canada: a longitudinal, prospective, registry-based cohort study

J. Dianti, L. E. Lovblom, M. A. Iftikhar, S. Sahetya, I. Telias, M. Urner, L. del Sorbo, M. B. Amato et al.

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2025

1,186 participants · 27 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physiological data suggest that insufficient and excessive respiratory drive and effort during mechanical ventilation might injure the lung and diaphragm, but their clinical relevance is unknown.

METHODS

In this prospective, registry-based cohort study from the Toronto Intensive Care Observational Registry, we included all adults on mechanical ventilation admitted to the medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at Toronto General Hospital from June 25, 2019, to April 1, 2022. There were no exclusion criteria. We obtained daily measurements of drive (airway occlusion pressure, P0·1), effort (expiratory occlusion pressure, Pocc), lung stress during spontaneous breathing (dynamic transpulmonary driving pressure, ΔPL,dyn), and ventilator-delivered dynamic driving pressure (ΔPaw,dyn) for the first 10 days of mechanical ventilation. Daily hazards of death in ICU or discharge alive from ICU were quantified using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for changing severity of illness over time.

FINDINGS

We included 1186 patients. 298 (25%) patients died during follow-up. P0·1 and Pocc showed a non-linear association with the hazards of death and discharge alive (p≤0·024). In patients with a ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) of 150 mm Hg or less, both low and high levels of P0·1 and Pocc were associated with lower rate of ICU discharge; when PaO2:FiO2 was greater than 150 mm Hg, higher P0·1 and Pocc were associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,186 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free