Evidence Hub

Insulin resistance assessed by estimated glucose disposal rate predicts cardiovascular disease in stages 0–3 of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a UK biobank cohort study

Hao Zhang, Si-Zhuang Huang, Yanwen Fang, Hai-Hua Zhang, Wei-Xian Yang, Mengyue Yu

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

325,312 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Insulin resistance (IR) has been recognized as a critical factor in the progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet its association with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IR, as measured by the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), on the risk of future CVD events in individuals with CKM stages 0–3. This study included 325,312 participants from the UK Biobank with CKM stages 0–3. IR was quantified using eGDR, a non-insulin-dependent metric, with lower values indicating greater IR. Participants were stratified into quartiles based on eGDR distribution. The primary outcome was incident CVD, including coronary heart disease, stroke, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease. In the CKM 0–3 cohort, eGDR demonstrated the highest predictive value for future CVD events among non-insulin-dependent IR metrics. Incorporating eGDR significantly improved the predictive performance of the PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease Risk Equations (AUC: PREVENT Equations + eGDR 0.743 vs. PREVENT Equations 0.719, p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 13.57 years, 48,433 incident CVD cases were identified. The adjusted rates of CVD incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) across eGDR quartiles (Q1–Q4) were 3.84 (3.62–4.07), 3.82 (3.66–3.98), 3.53 (3.41–3.65), and 3.37 (3.25–3.50) per 1000 person-years. RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear association between eGDR and CVD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 325,312 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free