Evidence Hub

Life’s Essential 8 cardiovascular health, cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages, and incident cardiovascular events: a nationwide 10-year prospective cohort study in China

Mian Li, Min Xu, Yi Ding, Hong Lin, G. Qin, Tian-Ge Wang, Yu Xu, Yu-Hong Chen et al.

Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2025

100,727 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Definition and staging rationale of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome were developed. The utility of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic construct in risk stratification and target strategies of health and behavior modifications needs to be addressed. The study aims to investigate the individual and combined associations of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic stage and cardiovascular health (CVH) by Life’s Essential 8 (LE 8) with incident cardiovascular events (CVD), and determine the distribution and contribution of domain-specific CVH across cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic stages. The study included 100,727 individuals in the China Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer Cohort with complete data on cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic factors and LE 8 metrics, with a median follow-up of 10.1 years. Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic stages and CVH metrics (nicotine exposure, diet, physical activity, sleep, body mass index, blood lipids, blood pressure, blood glucose) were defined according to Presidential Advisory from the American Heart Association. Incident CVD events including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were validated. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CKM stages or CVH status associated with CVD. Compared with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic stage 0, the adjusted competing HRs and 95% CIs of CVD events were 1.20 (0.95–1.51), 2.45 (1.97–3.04), 4.43 (3.53–5.58), and 5.95 (4.75–7.45)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 100,727 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free