Evidence Hub

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic alcohol-related liver disease, and incident dementia: a nationwide cohort study

Woo-young Shin, E. Kang, Y. Oh, Meng Sha, Qiang Xia, S. Jeong, Yoosun Cho

BMC Gastroenterology, 2025

296,001 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

The relationship between the newly proposed steatotic liver disease (SLD) subtypes—metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD)—and dementia is understudied. We evaluated the dementia risk associated with these subtypes. This retrospective cohort study included 296,001 participants aged over 60 who underwent health examinations between 2009 and 2010. Participants were categorized into non-SLD (reference), MASLD, and MetALD groups and followed up until dementia onset, death, or December 31, 2019. SLD was defined by a fatty liver index ≥ 30, with (i) MASLD based on cardiometabolic risk factors, and (ii) MetALD as MASLD with moderate alcohol intake. Outcomes included overall dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD). Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) was calculated using the Fine–Gray model, treating death as a competing risk. Over 7,430,253 person-years of follow-up, 11,345 dementia cases occurred (10,863 AD and 2,159 VaD). Adjusted SHRs for MASLD were 1.10 (1.07–1.13) for AD and 1.20 (1.13–1.27) for VaD. For MetALD, SHRs were 0.90 (0.87–0.94) for AD and 1.53 (1.40–1.66) for VaD. Dementia risk in both MASLD and MetALD increased over longer periods, with MetALD initially linked to increased VaD risk and decreased AD risk, which reversed after three years. MASLD and MetALD were associated with increased risks of AD and VaD; MetALD showing a stronger association with VaD.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 296,001 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free