Evidence Hub

The presence and prognosis of nerve pathology following whiplash injury: a prospective cohort study

J. Fundaun, C. Ridehalgh, S. Koushesh, Alex Novak, Macarena Tejos-Bravo, S. Bremner, G. Baskozos, Andrew Dilley et al.

Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025

129 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) affect 20–50 million individuals globally each year, with ≤50% developing persistent pain. WAD grade II (WADII) is the most common type and is characterized by neck symptoms and musculoskeletal signs without apparent nerve injury on routine diagnostic testing. However, emerging evidence suggests that nerve pathology might be present in some people with WADII. This longitudinal cohort study aimed to investigate comprehensively the presence, temporal patterns and prognostic value of nerve pathology and neuropathic pain in acute WADII. A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted with 129 acute participants with WADII (median age 36.0 years, 58% female) and 36 healthy controls (median age 39.0 years, 61% female). Participants with WADII were recruited within 4 weeks of injury from local emergency departments. Data collection included bedside neurological assessments, quantitative sensory testing, intraepidermal nerve fibre density and serum neurofilament light chain concentrations. Follow-up assessments were conducted 6 months after injury. Signs of neuropathic pain were present in 65% (84/129) acutely and persisted in 32% (21/66) 6 months post-injury. Bedside neurological assessment revealed that somatosensory loss-of-function was present in 54% (70/129) acutely, reducing to 25% (17/67) 6 months post-injury. Quantitative sensory testing demonstrated significantly reduced cold, warm, thermal sensory limen, mechanical and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 129 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free