Evidence Hub

Ocular massage in central retinal artery occlusion: Monitoring vascular recovery with optical coherence tomography angiography – A case series

Clara Rizzo, Stefano Mercuri, C. Lavia, Pasquale Viggiano, G. Virgili, F. Giansanti, F. Faraldi, D. Bacherini

American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO) is an ophthalmic emergency with a generally poor visual prognosis. Currently, no universally effective, evidence-based treatment exists, and therapeutic options remain limited. Ocular massage (OM) has been proposed as a potential intervention aimed at dislodging emboli and improving retinal perfusion. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) is emerging as a valuable imaging tool for assessing retinal microvascular changes in real-time. This study evaluates the role of OM in CRAO management and highlights the utility of OCTA in monitoring vascular response. Methods We present a case series of three patients diagnosed with CRAO who underwent prolonged OM. OCTA was performed before, during, and after treatment to assess changes in retinal capillary plexus perfusion. Visual acuity (VA) and structural OCT findings were also recorded. Results OM led to significant improvements in VA and retinal perfusion in all cases. OCTA revealed progressive increases in vessel density within both the superficial and deep capillary plexuses during OM, correlating with clinical recovery. One case of transient retinal artery occlusion (TRAO) demonstrated no apparent structural changes on fundus examination or OCT, but OCTA successfully identified early microvascular alterations, enabling prompt diagnosis and intervention. Conclusions OM appears to promote retinal reperfusion in CRAO, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit. OCTA proves to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free