Evidence Hub

Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Gas-producing Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: A Case Report

Travis S. Bullock, Zachary N. Jodoin, Samuel S Ornell, Nicolas A. Morton-Gonzaba, R. Karia, Case Martin

Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: It is well known that diabetic patients have impaired wound healing, increased susceptibility to infection, and harbor tissue that supports the growth of gas-producing infections. Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an uncommon soft-tissue infection characterized by extensive necrosis of subcutaneous tissue and fascia with relative sparing of the skin and muscle tissues. The majority of gas-producing infections are polymicrobial in nature, and therefore, NF with Staphylococcus aureus as a single etiologic agent is exceedingly uncommon. Case Report: This is a case of a 46-year-old male that developed gas-forming NF and abscesses from methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) after a complicated course involving undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), diabetic ketoacidosis, and bacteremia. The disease course presented relatively slowly with mild systemic symptoms, knee pain, erythema, and edema, but steadily progressed over days leading to an elevated level of care. Multidisciplinary care was necessary to treat the patient, including surgical and intravenous antibiotic therapies. The patient’s care was prolonged due to decreased patient compliance with recommended therapies and difficulty with appropriate shared decision-making. Conclusion: Although NF caused by monomicrobial infection with methicillin-resistant S. aureus has been previously reported, awareness of this condition remains limited, especially with concomitant gas formation. Physicians should…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free