Evidence Hub

A Case Report Supporting the Use of Teclistamab in Multiple Myeloma With CNS Involvement

Jessica Blackman, Justin Blackman, A. Pauranik, Ashley T. Freeman

Case Reports in Hematology, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Central nervous system involvement in multiple myeloma (MM‐CNS) is a condition with poor prognosis and no clear treatment options. Standard regimens, including proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory (IMiD) agents, provide minimal benefit in this setting, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Teclistamab, a bispecific T‐cell engager (BiTE) targeting B‐cell maturation agent (BCMA) and CD3, has demonstrated robust systemic activity in heavily pretreated MM but its role in CNS disease remains undefined, as patients with CNS involvement have been excluded from pivotal trials. We present the case of a 62‐year‐old female with high‐risk MM who developed extensive leptomeningeal myelomatosis following multiple lines of therapy including autologous transplantation, PI‐ and IMiD‐based regimens, and palliative radiotherapy. Upon presentation with confusion, aphasia, and ataxia, MRI revealed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement. The patient elected to proceed with teclistamab therapy. Following two cycles, she achieved a very good partial serologic response and MRI demonstrated marked radiologic improvement with resolution of cerebellar nodularity and sulcal enhancement. However, functional recovery was not observed, and the treatment was discontinued after three cycles due to clinical decline and infectious complications. She subsequently transitioned to supportive care and passed away 1 month later. This case report documents one of the first reports of teclistamab…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free