Evidence Hub

A randomised controlled phase 3 trial of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in taxane-naive patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore)

M. Morris, D. Castellano, Ken Herrmann, J. de Bono, N. Shore, Kim N. Chi, M. Crosby, J. Piulats et al.

The Lancet, 2024

617 participants · 218 citations

Abstract

Summary BACKGROUND [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) prolongs radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane therapy. PSMAfore is an ongoing phase 3 trial investigating the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with taxane-naive mCRPC. METHODS Taxane-naive patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC who had progressed once on prior ARPI were randomised 1:1 to open-label intravenous 177Lu-PSMA-617 7·4 GBq (200 mCi) ± 10% once every 6 weeks for six cycles or change of ARPI (to abiraterone or enzalutamide, administered orally on a continuous basis as per product labelling). Crossover from ARPI change to 177Lu-PSMA-617 was allowed after centrally confirmed radiographic progression. The primary endpoint was rPFS. Safety was a secondary endpoint. FINDINGS Overall, 468 patients were randomised to 177Lu-PSMA-617 (n=234) or ARPI change (n=234). Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between groups. Median number of 177Lu-PSMA-617 cycles was 6 (interquartile range, 2). Of patients randomised to ARPI change, 134 patients (57%) crossed over to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617. In the primary analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for radiographic progression or death for 177Lu-PSMA-617 vs ARPI change was 0·41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0·29–0·56; p<0·0001; median rPFS, 9·30 months…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 617 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free