Evidence Hub

JAK inhibition enhances checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

Jaroslav Zak, Isaraphorn Pratumchai, Brett S. Marro, Kristi L. Marquardt, R. B. Zavareh, Luke L. Lairson, Michael B. A. Oldstone, Judith A. Varner et al.

Science, 2024

19 participants · 174 citations

Abstract

Unleashing antitumor T cell activity by checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is effective in cancer patients, but clinical responses are limited. Cytokine signaling through the Janus kinase (JAK)–signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway correlates with checkpoint immunotherapy resistance. We report a phase I clinical trial of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib with anti–PD-1 antibody nivolumab in Hodgkin lymphoma patients relapsed or refractory following checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. The combination yielded a best overall response rate of 53% (10/19). Ruxolitinib significantly reduced neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and percentages of myeloid suppressor cells but increased numbers of cytokine-producing T cells. Ruxolitinib rescued the function of exhausted T cells and enhanced the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical solid tumor and lymphoma models. This synergy was characterized by a switch from suppressive to immunostimulatory myeloid cells, which enhanced T cell division. Editor’s summary Cancer immunotherapy is a type of treatment that mobilizes a patient’s immune system to kill tumor cells. It has been successful in treating certain tumors, but patients frequently have chronic inflammation and immunosuppression, which can limit treatment response. Two independent clinical trials looked at whether dialing down inflammation using drugs called JAK inhibitors could improve the efficacy of anti–PD-1 immunotherapy in cancer patients (see…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free