Evidence Hub

MP47-11 pharmacological management of premature ejaculation: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy M. La, Nicole Wright, John Donato, Nelson W. Mills, Mohit Khera

The Journal of Urology, 2024

9,025 participants

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction: Medical, Hormonal & Non-surgical Therapy I (MP47)1 May 2024MP47-11 PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT OF PREMATURE EJACULATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS David E. Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Gal Saffati, Shane Kronstedt, Troy La, Nicole Wright, John Donato, Nelson Mills, and Mohit Khera David E. Hinojosa-GonzalezDavid E. Hinojosa-Gonzalez , Gal SaffatiGal Saffati , Shane KronstedtShane Kronstedt , Troy LaTroy La , Nicole WrightNicole Wright , John DonatoJohn Donato , Nelson MillsNelson Mills , and Mohit KheraMohit Khera View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008880.11564.10.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Premature ejaculation (PE) is defined as concurrent brief ejaculatory time, loss of control, and related psychological distress to the patient and/or partner. While PE is one of the most prevalent male sexual dysfunctions, its management remains highly variable with a plethora of pharmacological options at the urologist's disposal. Thus, we sought to comprehensively compare the efficacy of drugs and dosing regimens used in the treatment of PE. METHODS: In May 2023, a systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacologic treatments in patients with PE. Included studies reported intravaginal ejaculatory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,025 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free