Evidence Hub

Male reproductive phenotype in cystic fibrosis: comparison of existing animal models

Angèle Boursier, C. Cottart, Aissatu Balde-Camara, François Vialard, A. Barbotin

Lab animal, 2026

Abstract

In men, cystic fibrosis (CF) leads to infertility in over 95% of cases, due to early and progressive atresia of the vas deferens, resulting in obstructive azoospermia. The advent of highly effective modulator therapy has enabled more men with CF to consider parenthood, raising important questions regarding the impact of these treatments on male fertility. Animal models provide major insights into the mechanism of CF-related reproductive tract abnormalities, yet high interspecies variability complicates model selection. Mouse models display heterogeneous phenotype: knock-in or partial knockout models usually remain fertile, whereas complete knockouts may develop vas deferens atresia with aging. Among currently studied models, CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-knockout rats more closely reproduce the human phenotype, showing bilateral absence of the vas deferens and epididymal hypoplasia, although they exhibit more pronounced hypospermatogenesis than observed in men. In larger animal models, including ferrets, pigs, sheep and rabbits, absence of the vas deferens duct and epididymis is frequently observed, often with normal testicular histology; however, most studies in these species have mainly focused on neonatal stages, leaving long-term reproductive outcomes uncharacterized. No single model fully replicates human male reproductive pathology in CF. Combining rodent and large-animal models is probably essential to elucidate the mechanisms of vas deferens absence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free