Evidence Hub

Effects of composition, finishing, and salivary pH on physicomechanical and biological properties of additively manufactured resin-ceramic composites: An in vitro study

Hyun-Tae Kim, Ye-Hyeon Jo, Eunbyeol Jee, Hyung-In Yoon

E -journal of dentistry, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of composition and finishing on the physicomechanical and biological properties of additively manufactured resin-ceramic composites (AM RCs) for definitive restorations under simulated oral environments with different pH levels.

METHODS

Disk- and bar-shaped specimens were fabricated with 4 AM RCs (Crowntec [CT], Freeprint Crown [FP], VarseoSmile TriniQ [TQ], and VarseoSmile Crown plus [CP]). The specimens underwent either polishing or glazing and were immersed in artificial saliva at neutral and acidic pH levels (37°C, 7 days). Each saliva-conditioned specimen was evaluated for microhardness (HV), flexural strength (FS), protein adsorption (OD), water sorption (WS), and bacterial adhesion (BA). Cell morphology and migration were evaluated. A 3-way aligned rank transform analysis of variance was performed for HV, FS, OD, WS, and BA, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05).

RESULTS

CT showed the highest HV (P<0.001). CT had the highest FS, whereas CP had the lowest (P<0.05). Glazed AM RCs showed lower OD than polished AM RCs in acidic saliva (P<0.001). For WS, FP was the highest in neutral saliva, while TQ was the highest in acidic saliva (P<0.05). BA was significantly affected by salivary pH (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

CT showed superior physicomechanical properties. In acidic saliva, all AM RCs showed lower OD after glazing, whereas BA increased regardless of composition or finishing.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCES

Material…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free