Evidence Hub

Breathe Easy Gippsland-Community Attitudes Towards Expanding Smoke- and Vape-Free Zones in Gippsland, Victoria, Australia

Kocaali N, Tatterson L, Connell A, Frescura N, Jongenelis M, Lim MSC, Owen T, Patino V et al.

Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026

662 participants

Abstract

Issue addressed: This study explored community attitudes towards expanding smoke- and vape-free zones in Gippsland, Victoria, to inform public health policy aimed at reducing smoking and vaping-related harm.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Gippsland residents aged 12 and older (n = 662), examining support for increased measures to address smoking and vaping in Gippsland. Descriptive statistics assessed demographic characteristics and survey responses, and logistic regression analysis examined associations between support for interventions and key correlates. Responses from open-ended questions regarding the implementation of smoke- and vape-free zones were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Most respondents (91%) supported further action to reduce tobacco and e-cigarette-related harm and endorse the expansion of smoke- and vape-free zones. Among business owners/managers, nearly half (48%) anticipated no business impact, while 29% anticipated a positive outcome. Compared to people who smoke, occasional (UOR 4.75, 95% CI 1.45-18.93, p = 0.015) and non-smokers (UOR 22.45, 95% CI 10.22-50.26, p < 0.001) were more likely to support the expansion of zones. Younger respondents aged 16-18 were less supportive compared to those aged 60 and older (UOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.92, p = 0.012).

Conclusions: The findings indicate strong overall community support for expanding smoke- and vape-free zones in Gippsland. Findings varied by smoking status…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 662 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free