Evidence Hub

Periodontal and Peri-Implant Status Among Users of Different Inhaled Tobacco and Nicotine Products: A Systematic Review

Di Palo MP, Di Spirito F, Giordano F, De Benedetto G, Lo Giudice R, Piedepalumbo F, Balsamo G, Pessolano C et al.

Dentistry journal, 2026

3,106 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Periodontal and peri-implant diseases are influenced by several risk factors, including smoking. While cigarette smoking (CS) is a well-established risk factor, the impact of heated tobacco products (HTPs), electronic cigarettes (E-Cigs), and waterpipe (WS) remains less clear. This systematic review aimed to update the current evidence evaluating the clinical, radiographical, and inflammatory biomarkers of periodontal and peri-implant status among different untreated adult users of inhaled tobacco and nicotine products. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between April 2022 and December 2025. Data were extracted and synthesized qualitatively according to the study protocol (PROSPERO: CRD420261284851). Studies were qualitatively assessed using the Risk-of-Bias in Nonrandomized-I. Results: Thirty-one studies including 3106 subjects were analyzed. CS consistently showed the worst periodontal and peri-implant status, with higher plaque indices, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), marginal bone loss (MBL) and more missing teeth. WS showed parameters comparable to CS and worse than non-smokers, with particularly high plaque accumulation and probing depth, as well as a pro-inflammatory biomarker profile. E-Cigs and HTPs generally exhibited intermediate status; E-Cigs showed increased PD and CAL compared with non-smokers, with elevated bleeding on probing despite a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free