Evidence Hub

Sharing Antivaping Social Media Messages

Lazard AJ, DiFranzo D, Nicolla S, Aghajari Z, Pulido M, Mao C, Vereen RN, Dasgupta N

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2025

712 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: Positive vaping portrayals and marketing from influencers receive billions of views on visual-based social media. Strategies are needed to counter these appeals and encourage sharing about health harms.

Methods: We recruited 712 US young adults (ages 18-25 years) through Cloud Research for our between-persons experiment. Participants were randomized to view four social media messages in one of the following three conditions: health harms, health harms with a social impact, or control. Participants first viewed and interacted with their condition messages on a simulated social media feed. Participants were shown messages again and reported sharing intentions, perceived message effectiveness, and relevance of each message. Last, participants reported vaping knowledge and beliefs.

Results: Health harm messages lead to greater sharing intentions, perceived message effectiveness (discouraged vaping), relevance, knowledge, and beliefs compare to control messages, p = .03-p < .001. Health harms paired with social impact messages discouraged vaping more than control messages but otherwise were rated similarly to the health harm messages. Participants would share antivaping messages mostly with friends (73%-76%) and through private (direct message, 55%) or ephemeral channels (social media stories, 46%-49%). Overall, Black and Hispanic young adults had higher sharing intentions, greater message relevance, and lower vaping knowledge compared to non-Hispanic White participants.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free