Evidence Hub

Awareness and Behavioral Determinants of Passive Smoking and Vaping Among Youth in Larkana: A Cross-Sectional Study

Mir Hassan Khoso, Iftikhar Ahmed Shaikh, Nusrat Shah, Faraz Ali Junejo, Amna Bhatti, R. Tunio, Yusra Azhar, Mubeen Arslan et al.

Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research, 2026

Abstract

Background: Passive smoking and vaping represent growing public health concerns, particularly among adolescents and young adults in developing countries where awareness does not consistently translate into behavioral change. Objective: To assess awareness, behavioral patterns, and psychosocial determinants of passive smoking and vaping among youth in Larkana, Pakistan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to August 2025 among 408 participants aged 12–25 years using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, t-tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression were applied to evaluate associations between demographic factors, awareness, and behavioral outcomes. Results: Awareness of passive smoking (81.9%) and vaping risks (83.6%) was high; however, significant gender differences in exposure were observed (χ²=28.338, p<0.001), along with age-related differences in exposure location (F=5.825, p<0.001). Peer pressure emerged as a significant predictor of vaping beliefs (OR=2.053, p=0.002), while awareness campaigns showed no significant association with improved knowledge (r=-0.024, p=0.631). Interpersonal discussions with parents or teachers significantly improved awareness (t=2.185, p=0.029). Effect sizes were small, and regression models demonstrated limited explanatory power (R²=0.04). Conclusion: Despite high awareness, behavioral outcomes remain suboptimal due to strong social influences. Interventions should focus on peer dynamics,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free