Evidence Hub

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on smoking and vaping: systematic review and meta-analysis

Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi, Kleo Evripidou, Antonios Siargkas, João Breda, Michail Chourdakis

Public Health, 2023

37 citations

Abstract

Objectives COVID-19 and the implementation of lockdowns have impacted daily lives worldwide. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of lockdowns on the smoking and vaping behaviours of adults during the pandemic. Study design This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted up to 28 April 2022 in the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Results In total, 77 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. In 34 studies, an increase in smoking behaviour was reported for the majority of participants; however, in 21 and 18 studies, ‘no change’ and ‘decrease’ in smoking were the predominant responses, respectively. The results from the meta-analysis, which examined the change in the number of cigarettes smoked per day, showed no difference between the pre- and post-lockdown periods: 0.81 weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval, −0.59 to 2.21). Regarding vaping, three of seven studies reported an increase in smoking for the majority of participants, whereas ‘no change’ and ‘decrease’ were the predominant answers in the other four studies. Conclusions The results show that lockdowns led most participants to increase smoking/vaping, whereas a decrease or cessation of smoking/vaping was only reported in the minority of participants. Attention should be given to the non-communicable diseases that could arise as a result of the increase in smoking/vaping during…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free