Evidence Hub

Acute health effects after passive e-vape among patients with COPD – an RCT exposure study

Karin Rosenkilde Laursen, Jakob Hjort Bønløkke, Merete Bilde, Marianne Glasius, Elisabeth M. Bendstrup, Søren K. Kjærgaard, Anna‐Carin Olin, Torben Sigsgaard

2020

16 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: E-cigarette use is dramatically increasing and often permitted in smoke-free areas causing passive vape exposure. Little is known about potential adverse health effects of passive vape and people with respiratory diseases may be more susceptible. Our aim was to investigate local and systemic effects of short-term passive exposure to vape among patients with mild or moderate COPD. Methods: In a randomised double-blinded crossover study non-smoking COPD patients were exposed for four hours at two different exposure conditions separated by 14 days; A) clean filtered air (particles concentration <6 µg/m3) and B) passive vaping (median: 18 µg/m3 (range: 8-333)). E-cigarette users in an adjacent chamber were vaping in situation B and vape-polluted air was passed to the exposure chamber. Health effects including FEV1/FVC, FeNO, Surfactant Protein-A (SP-A) in Particles in Exhaled Air (PExA) and plasma biomarkers were evaluated before, after, and 24 h. after exposures. Results: 16 patients (mean age 68) participated. Exposure to passive vape did not alter FEV1/FVC or FeNO. SP-A in exhaled air was negatively affected by time and exposure to vape, and some plasma biomarkers (citrate, phospholipids and free cholesterol in very large HDL plus triglycerides in medium HDL) increased significantly after exposure to vape alone. Conclusions: At the exposure levels in the study, SP-A in exhaled particles, citrate and some plasma biomarkers in patients with COPD were affected by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free