Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in Uropathogens Isolated from Type 2 Diabetic Patients in a Tertiary Hospital, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Approach

Owusu G, Antwi-Adjei M, Boakye IN, Peprah AAO, Sherifa M, Ofori-Amoah J

2026

261 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Uropathogens and their resistance to antibiotics in Type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients are a significant global health concern. This study assesses the prevalence of uropathogens and their antimicrobial resistance among T2DM patients seeking healthcare at Sunyani Teaching Hospital (STH), Ghana. Method A cross-sectional study involving 261 T2DM patients at STH in the Bono Region of Ghana was conducted from November 2024 to September 2025. A structured questionnaire and hospital records were used to collect patient data. Fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels were obtained using a glucometer. Early morning midstream urine samples were collected and assessed for uropathogens, pyuria, and glucosuria. Positive uropathogen was defined as a colony-forming unit (CFU) ≥ 10 5 /mL. An antimicrobial susceptibility test was conducted using the disc diffusion method. Results Of the 261 patients, involving 54 (20.7%) males and 207 (79.3%) females, 72 (27.6%) tested positive for uropathogens. Enterococcus species, 18 (25.0%); Enterobacter species, 15 (20.8%); Escherichia coli , 9 (12.5%); and Candida species, 9 (12.5%), were the most common uropathogens identified. The use of a water closet (P 5] (P E. coli, S. epidermidis, Acinetobacter spp, and Citrobacter spp . were resistant to ≥ 3 classes of the test drugs, while Enterococcus spp . was susceptible to all the test drugs except tetracycline. Levofloxacin and meropenem showed 100% efficacy in all the Gram-positive and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free