Evidence Hub

The association of environmental exposure in the etiology of esophageal atresia in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

O. Boybeyi, Melda Çelik, Umut Ece Arslan, Thomas Ciecierega, Sarah T. Jewell, Tutku Soyer, Siddika Songul Yalcin

Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2025

108 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

AIM

To elucidate the impact of environmental exposure on the etiology of esophageal atresia (EA), identify potential risk factors, and propose preventive measures.

METHOD

Protocol drafted under PRISMA guideline and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023391247). A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases (EMBASE, Pubmed, CENTRAL) covering the period from January 2002 to September 2023. The search strategy consisted of a combination of terms related to EA, preconceptional exposure, fetal exposure, and environmental exposure. Statistical analysis was performed with CMA-V4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 391 abstracts were identified and 345 abstracts were screened. Full-text of the selected articles (n=108) were assessed for eligibility, with 24 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Maternal alcohol consumption during the periconceptional period [OR: 1.26 (95% CI: 1.09-1.45), p=0.002] and passive smoking [OR: 1.25 (95% CI: 1.053-1.48), p=0.011] were related with higher EA risk. EA risk was significantly higher in mothers with gestational diabetes [OR: 1.95 (95% CI: 1.53-2.48), p<0.001] and in those aged over 35 years old [OR: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.22-1.79), p<0.001]. There was not statistically significant association between environmental pollution and occurrence of EA [OR: 1.29 (95% CI: 0.98-1.68), p=0.068].

CONCLUSION

This systematic review revealed that environmental factors may contribute to the development of EA. Specifically, maternal alcohol consumption,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 108 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free