Evidence Hub

The Impact of Cigarette Smoking, Waterpipe Smoking, and E-Cigarette Vaping on Peri-Implant Clinical Outcomes and Inflammatory Markers: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lior Bangiev, Idan Lubotcky, Ari Yitzhak Lugassy, Lir Ben Mizrahi, Tomer Roubinov, G. Juodžbalys

eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the impact of cigarette smoking, waterpipe smoking, and electronic cigarette vaping on peri-implant clinical outcomes and inflammatory biomarkers in comparison with non-smokers. Material and Methods The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Studies published between October 2015 and October 2025 involving adults with dental implants were included. Random-effects models calculated mean differences (MD) for marginal bone loss and cytokines, and standardized mean differences (SMD) for plaque index and bleeding on probing (BOP). Results All smoking modalities were associated with significantly worse peri-implant outcomes than non-smokers. Plaque index increased for cigarette (+5.22 units), waterpipe (+6.31), and e-cigarette users (+1.61). Marginal bone loss was greater in cigarette (+2.16 mm), waterpipe (+1.9 mm), and e-cigarette users (+0.83 mm). Cigarette smokers showed the highest IL-1β (MD = 239.63 pg/mL), while e-cigarette users exhibited elevated IL-1β (+170 pg/mL) and TNF-α (+17.6 pg/mL). A paradoxical reduction in BOP was observed. Subgroup analyses confirmed a risk gradient of cigarette > waterpipe > e-cigarette > non-smoker. Conclusions Cigarette smoking exerts the greatest detrimental effect on peri-implant outcomes, followed by waterpipe and e-cigarette use.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free