Evidence Hub

Electronic Cigarettes (ENDS OR ENNDS) Smoking in Asian Countries After Complete Vaping Ban: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S. Kuthe, Vedavati Bandyopadhyay, P. Aparnavi, U. Venkatesh, B. Padhi, A. Gandhi

Substance Use & Misuse, 2025

Abstract

Abstract Background The harmful health effects of e-cigarettes have led to the imposition of ban on the manufacturing, import, export, advertisement, transport, and sale of such products to varying extents. Purpose The primary objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence of e-cigarette consumption in Asian countries where a ban has been imposed. Methodology The relevant studies published after the ban were obtained from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus (Date of search: 08 May 2024). Cross-sectional and analytical research on the prevalence of vaping from the eligible countries were obtained irrespective of age or gender. Qualitative studies, trials, case reports, case series & reviews, and people who are not vaping e-cigarettes but other form of cigarettes, and studies with ambiguous study/data collection period were excluded. The review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542959) Findings A total of 22 articles from five Southern Asian countries, mostly from Thailand, were eligible. The pooled prevalence of vaping post ban of e-cigarettes was 16% with high heterogeneity (I2=99.7%). The pooled prevalence of the same in India and Palestine were 14% and 19.7%%, respectively. Meta-regressions showed no significant effect of the duration of e-cigarette ban, year of publication, and mean age of the study population on the prevalence of e-cigarette use. Conclusion Despite bans presenting an impression of elimination, vaping remains…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free