Evidence Hub

Risk Factors Associated With Incidence of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S. Naidu, Allegra Wisking, Akul Karoshi, S. Burdett, P. Godolphin, S. Popat, S. Janes, N. Navani

JTO Clinical and Research Reports, 2025

11 citations

Abstract

Objectives Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality globally. Although often associated with smoking, up to 25% of cases worldwide and 50% in East Asia occur in “never-smokers.” There are currently no robust tools for predicting lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) for populations outside East Asia. Together with a group of patient representatives, the authors of this study aimed to summarise risk factors for LCINS and quantify risk in different geographical regions. Methods This study was prospectively registered (PROSPERO-CRD42022379253). The systematic review and meta-analysis included studies published from 2017 and aimed to comprehensively investigate risk factors associated with LCINS incidence. Risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results A total of 6725 reports were identified and 54 studies were included, with multivariable analysis of 192 factors in 16 million never-smokers. No studies were assessed as having high risk of bias. Of the participants, 8,241,269 (51.0%) were from Western countries. The meta-analysis found that female sex (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.28 [95% confidence interval or CI 1.12–1.47]), previous cancer (aHR 2.04 [1.95–2.13]), rheumatoid arthritis (aHR 1.41 [1.15–1.73]), passive smoking (aHR 1.30 [1.22–1.40]), PM10 (aHR 1.10 [1.09–1.11]), and PM2.5 (aHR 1.16 [1.03–1.30]) pollution were associated with LCINS. In planned subgroup analyses by region, LCINS was associated with family history of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free