Evidence Hub

Active and passive smoking and the risk of breast cancer: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

L. Tsegay, Dawit Zena, Y. Gizachew, S. Demelash, G. Ayano

Annals of Epidemiology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking, both active and passive, has been associated with an increased risk of numerous cancers worldwide, yet its impact on breast cancer remains a subject of debate. While many studies have explored the link between smoking and breast cancer risk, the findings have been inconsistent and often contradictory. To clarify the nature and strength of the association between smoking exposure (current, former, and passive) and breast cancer, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024610213).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to October 24, 2024, and manually screened reference lists. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (cohort, case-control, and/or cross-sectional) examining the association between smoking (current, former, and passive) and breast cancer were included. Predefined evidence classification criteria were applied to assess the credibility of associations, graded as convincing (class I), highly suggestive (class II), suggestive (class III), weak (class IV), or no evidence (class V). Data were extracted for effect estimates, heterogeneity (I²), 95 % prediction intervals, small study effects, and excess significance bias, using random-effects models and AMSTAR 2 to evaluate methodological quality.

FINDINGS

We identified 1095 articles, of which eight meta-analytic systematic reviews, encompassing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free