Evidence Hub

Electronic cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking in young people: A systematic review

R. Begh, Monserrat Conde, T. Fanshawe, D. Kneale, L. Shahab, Sufen Zhu, Mike Pesko, J. Livingstone-Banks et al.

Addiction, 2025

41 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aims To assess the evidence for a relationship between the use of e‐cigarettes and subsequent smoking in young people (≤29 years), and whether this differs by demographic characteristics. Methods Systematic review with association direction plots (searches to April 2023). Screening, data extraction and critical appraisal followed Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was the association between e‐cigarette use, availability or both, and change in population rate of smoking in young people. The secondary outcomes were initiation, progression and cessation of smoking at individual level. We assessed certainty using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Results We included 126 studies. For our primary outcome, there was very low certainty evidence (limited by risk of bias and inconsistency) suggesting that e‐cigarette use and availability were inversely associated with smoking in young people (i.e. as e‐cigarettes became more available and/or used more widely, youth smoking rates went down or, conversely, as e‐cigarettes were restricted, youth smoking rates went up). All secondary outcomes were judged to be very low certainty due to very serious risk of bias. Data consistently showed direct associations between vaping at baseline and smoking initiation (28 studies) and smoking progression (5 studies). The four studies contributing data on smoking cessation had mixed results, precluding drawing any conclusion on the direction of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free