Evidence Hub

Characteristics of COVID-19 in Homeless Shelters : A Community-Based Surveillance Study

Rogers JH, Link AC, McCulloch D, Brandstetter E, Newman KL, Jackson ML, Hughes JP, Englund JA et al.

Annals of internal medicine, 2021

21 participants · 57 citations

Abstract

Background: Homeless shelters are a high-risk setting for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission because of crowding and shared hygiene facilities.

Objective: To investigate SARS-CoV-2 case counts across several adult and family homeless shelters in a major metropolitan area.

Design: Cross-sectional, community-based surveillance study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04141917).

Setting: 14 homeless shelters in King County, Washington.

Participants: A total of 1434 study encounters were done in shelter residents and staff, regardless of symptoms.

Intervention: 2 strategies were used for SARS-CoV-2 testing: routine surveillance and contact tracing ("surge testing") events.

Measurements: The primary outcome measure was test positivity rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection at shelters, determined by dividing the number of positive cases by the total number of participant encounters, regardless of symptoms. Sociodemographic, clinical, and virologic variables were assessed as correlates of viral positivity.

Results: Among 1434 encounters, 29 (2% [95% CI, 1.4% to 2.9%]) cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected across 5 shelters. Most (n = 21 [72.4%]) were detected during surge testing events rather than routine surveillance, and most (n = 21 [72.4% {CI, 52.8% to 87.3%}]) were asymptomatic at the time of sample collection. Persons who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 were more frequently aged 60 years or older than those without SARS-CoV-2 (44.8% vs. 15.9%).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 21 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free