Evidence Hub

Mutational profile of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to HPV, tobacco smoking and prognosis with validation in the DAHANCA 19 randomized trial

J. Lilja-Fischer, Morten Horsholt Kristensen, P. Lassen, T. Steiniche, T. Tramm, M. Stougaard, A. Frederiksen, B. Ulhøi et al.

Acta oncologica, 2025

162 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background and purpose This study investigated prognostic biomarkers in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with a focus on tumors related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and potential molecular effects of tobacco smoking, as smokers with HPV+ OPSCC often have poorer outcomes. Patients/material and methods We first analyzed 56 previously untreated OPSCC patients (exploration cohort), assessing HPV status, gene expression related to hypoxia, tumor subtype, and radiosensitivity, together with next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cancer-related genes. A custom NGS panel was subsequently designed and validated in 162 patients from the DAHANCA 19 randomized controlled trial (RCT), all treated with curative (chemo-)radiotherapy. Results In the exploration cohort (40 HPV+, 79%), the most common molecular events in HPV+ tumors were PIK3CA and ATR mutations and chromosome 3q amplification. ATR and CREBBP mutations occurred more often in heavy smokers (>10 pack-years), but these associations were not confirmed in the DAHANCA 19 cohort. No specific smoking-related mutational signature or link to TP53 mutations was observed. In the DAHANCA 19 cohort, 17 locoregional failures (LRF) occurred among 128 HPV+ patients. No unifying molecular features were identified. However, mutations in NFE2L2 and CASP8, as well as amplifications of 3q genes (BCL6, SOX2), were associated with LRF. Interpretation In HPV+ OPSCC, only few molecular alterations appear to act as drivers or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 162 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free