Evidence Hub

Geriatric prehabilitation prior to surgery for kidney tumors: Study protocol for Pre-KiT - A randomized controlled trial

M. Juul-Haslund, C. Lund, T. Dolin, Katrine S. Schou-Jensen, P. Østergren, A. Vinther, F. F. Thomsen, M. Fode

Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2026

60 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) primarily affects older adults who often present with frailty, increasing their risk of surgical complications and delayed recovery. Prehabilitation, incorporating exercise, nutrition, and psychological support, may improve postoperative outcomes. However, no studies have investigated prehabilitation prior to surgery for RCC. The aim is to assess whether a one-month multimodal prehabilitation program including geriatric interventions improves recovery in patients with frailty undergoing surgery for localized RCC ≤ 7 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 patients, aged ≥65, with a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 3-6 are randomized 1:1 to standard care or prehabilitation involving home-based exercise, geriatric assessment with tailored interventions, and smoking cessation support. The primary outcome is change in Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) 21 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include changes in QoR-15, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and physical performance (30-s chair-stand test, handgrip strength) assessed preoperatively, 1, 21 and 90 days postoperatively. Postoperative complications will be evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification, alongside a cost-effectiveness analysis. Long-term outcomes include 1- and 5-year recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

Pre-KiT explores if a pragmatic geriatric prehabilitation strategy is effective and feasible for older frail patients with RCC. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free